Is Obama Really Preparing For Civil War?
InfoWars
12 Dicembre 2009
According to an obscure report in the European Union Times
(EUTimes.net), “Russian Military Analysts are reporting to Prime
Minister Putin that US President Barack Obama has issued an order to
his Northern Command’s (USNORTHCOM) top leader, US Air Force General
Gene Renuart, to ‘begin immediately’ increasing his military forces to
1 million troops by January 30, 2010, in what these reports warn is an
expected outbreak of civil war within the United States before the end
of winter.
“According to these reports, Obama has had over these past weeks
‘numerous’ meetings with his war council abut how best to manage the
expected implosion of his Nation’s banking system while at the same
time attempting to keep the United States military hegemony over the
World in what Russian Military Analysts state is a ‘last ditch gambit’
whose success is ‘far from certain.’”
The EU Times article continues by saying, “To the fears of Obama
over the United States erupting into civil war once the full extent of
the rape and pillaging of these peoples by their banks and government
becomes known to them, grim evidence now shows the likelihood of this
occurring much sooner than later.”
The Times story goes on to say that there are “over 220 million American people armed to the teeth and ready to explode.”
The Times article concludes by saying, “Though the coming civil war
in the United States is being virtually ignored by their propaganda
media, the same cannot be said of Russia, where leading Russian
political analyst, Professor Igor Panarin has long warned that the
economic turmoil in the United States has confirmed his long-held view
that the US is heading for collapse.”
Many of us would be inclined to pooh-pooh such a story, but then
there is this column from Bloomberg.com entitled “Arming Goldman With
Pistols Against Public,” written by Alice Schroeder. According to Ms
Schroeder:
“‘I just wrote my first reference for a gun permit,’ said a friend,
who told me of swearing to the good character of a Goldman Sachs Group
Inc. banker who applied to the local police for a permit to buy a
pistol. The banker had told this friend of mine that senior Goldman
people have loaded up on firearms and are now equipped to defend
themselves if there is a populist uprising against the bank.”
There is no doubt that the American people have good reason to
despise these international banksters epitomized by Goldman Sachs. Even
one of Goldman’s poster-boys, Henry Paulson, US Treasury secretary and
former Goldman CEO, admitted that the American people were fed up.
Schroeder quotes Paulson as saying, during testimony to Congress last
summer, “[People] were unhappy with the big discrepancies in wealth,
but they at least believed in the system and in some form of
market-driven capitalism. But if we had a complete meltdown, it could
lead to people questioning the basis of the system.”
Schroeder correctly opines, “There you have it. The bailout was
meant to keep the curtain drawn on the way the rich make money, not
from the free market, but from the lack of one. Goldman Sachs blew its
cover when the firm’s revenue from trading reached a record $27 billion
in the first nine months of this year, and a public that was writhing
in financial agony caught on that the profits earned on taxpayer
capital were going to pay employee bonuses.”
Schroeder concludes her column by saying, “And if the proles
[proletariat: plebs, working class, peasants] really do appear
brandishing pitchforks at the doors of Park Avenue and the gates of
Round Hill Road, you can be sure that the Goldman guys and their
families will be holed up in their safe rooms with their firearms.”
So, do Wall Street and Russian analysts know something that we don’t
know? Is this why George W. Bush initiated USNORTHCOM to begin with? Is
this why Barack Obama is beefing up USNORTHCOM? This would help explain
the reports of all those potential detention camps that have been
constructed (including the abandoned military installations that have
refurbished security fences, guard towers, etc., around them). Has the
American people’s disgust with these crooks and thieves within the
federal government and Wall Street reached a boiling point?
There is no question that people are angry, and for good reason.
The fraudulent financial policies of the Federal Reserve and its
lackeys in the White House and Congress have literally bankrupted the
country. Real unemployment is most likely over 20%. Taxes (along with
costly fees, regulations, restrictions, penalties, mandates, etc.) at
every level are going through the ceiling. America’s jobs have been
outsourced. Barack Obama continues G.W. Bush’s irresponsibility,
digging America deeper and deeper into foreign entanglements, at the
cost of trillions of dollars and thousands of lives. The IRS continues
to harass and harangue honest citizens, squeezing them like the
proverbial turnip. And now, add the insanity of a global climate treaty
being hammered out in Copenhagen, and a universal health care bill
being rammed through Congress, and the outlook is even gloomier.
I feel very comfortable in saying that the usurpations of power, the
encroachments upon liberty, and the arrogant tax-and-spend policies
emanating from Washington, D.C., and Wall Street these days are far
more egregious than what George Washington and the boys were enduring
in 1775-76 at the hands of the British Crown. There is no doubt in my
mind that if Thomas Jefferson, Patrick Henry, and Sam Adams were alive
today, they would have given cause for the Goldman Sachs banksters to
retreat to their bunkers years ago!
The fact is, we do need a revolution! But not a revolution of
anarchy and pitchforks. (The history of France should be ample evidence
of the futility of this strategy.) We need a revolution of the
individual states: to reclaim their sovereignty and fight for the
liberties of their sovereigns (We the People). That is exactly what our
forefathers did in ‘76.
America’s founding document (the Declaration of Independence)
declares that our states are “free and independent.” And so they are.
We are not “one nation” with one all-powerful central government. We
are a confederation of nation-states, united in a voluntary union, with
each State reserving to itself the power and authority of
self-determination, and ceding to the federal government limited,
specifically delineated duties and limitations–limitations that have
been totally ignored to the point that, for all intents and purposes,
our once-great constitutional republic has been thoroughly expunged.
Therefore, it is NOW time for the states to stand up to this
meddlesome, every-growing tyranny that is known as Washington, D.C.,
and defend the rights and liberties of their citizens!
What Dr. Ed Vieira (an attorney with 4 earned degrees from Harvard,
who has successfully argued cases before the US Supreme Court) wrote a
few weeks ago should serve as a template for every State governor and
legislature that truly cares about liberty. See Ed’s column at:
http://www.newswithviews.com/Vieira/edwin201.htm
As Vieira says, the states should resurrect their militias. Many–if
not all–states have the legal authority for such entities in their
constitutions. In some states they are called the State Guard. Some
plainly use the word “militia.” Whatever they are called, they need to
be activated. And all that is necessary for this to be accomplished is
the order of the governor. It’s that simple!
And as Vieira said, states need to adopt an alternative
currency–including, and most especially, gold and silver. In other
words, they need to develop their own private economies, complete with
their own banks and exchange mediums. They also need to reject the
multinational agribusiness and develop their own in-State agricultural
and energy businesses.
I would dare say that the first State that determines to follow
Vieira’s sagacious counsel (and rumblings of this have already begun in
states such as Alaska, Oklahoma, Texas, Montana, New Hampshire,
Indiana, Tennessee, South Carolina, etc.) would have so many
liberty-loving patriots flock there that its economy would explode with
prosperity–resulting in a domino effect of many other states following
suit–and the revolution that this country so desperately needs would
indeed take place. Furthermore, such a revolution would be
constitutional, lawful, moral, and, yes, in compliance with the laws of
Nature and of Nature’s God.
In the meantime, is Barack Obama really worried about civil war? He
might be. It is my observation that Washington politicians and
bureaucrats are the most paranoid people on the planet. The problem
is–as with most power-hungry Machiavellians–their paranoia often
translates into more oppression and less liberty for the citizenry. And
if this is true, it simply means that the states need to hurry up and
do what needs to be done!
by Chuck Baldwin
Source > InfoWars / December 11, 200