Canadian filmmaker Brent Leung isn't winning any friends in the
pharmaceutical industry these days. His breakthrough documentary "House
of Numbers" features jaw-dropping interviews with doctors, researchers
and even the co-discoverer of HIV himself (Luc Montagnier), all of whom
reveal startling information calling into question the "official"
explanation of HIV and AIDS.
The film isn't publicly available yet, as it's been screened in film
festivals around the world. Check the available screening events at the
film's website.
Because of the game-changing statements heard from
numerous health authorities in this film, it threatens the very
foundations of the HIV / AIDS industry. Pharmaceutical companies are
fronting a specific mythology about AIDS that maximizes their profits
from AIDS drugs and (failed) vaccines, but that mythology is about to
be dismantled when House of Numbers is released in theaters nationwide
over the next few months.
This could be the documentary that shatters Big Pharma's false paradigms about HIV and AIDS.
The AIDS testing hoax
In the film, Brent Leung subjects himself to an HIV test and
discovers that a "diagnosis" of being HIV positive has more to do with
the answers you provide to lifestyle questions than any specific
microbe appearing in your blood. The diagnosis of AIDS -- as well as
the very definition -- is also apparently so wishy-washy that
increasing numbers of well-trained scientists are now questioning
whether AIDS exists at all.
"The presently available data does not prove the existence of
HIV," says one health expert interviewed for the film. Another expert
says, "The more diseases they could lump into these AIDS categories,
the more patients they could catch."
"I think HIV totally has turned out not to be the cause of AIDS. HIV has turned out not to be!" says another interviewee.
"We can be exposed to HIV many times without being ...
infected," says Dr Luc Montagnier, the Nobel prize-winning virologist
credited with the co-discovery of HIV. "Our immune system creates
[antibodies] within a few weeks, if you have a good immune system."
The documentary film exposes the sharp contradictions in
current scientific opinion about HIV / AIDS. "As I started questioning
scientists and delving further into testing protocols and statistical
modeling and science, I began to see a lot of the contradictions that
they had amongst themselves," said filmmaker Brent Leung. "One of the
things that became apparent to me is how important it is to question
everything that we're told and not automatically accept any fact as
truth."
One bizarre thing the film exposes is the ever-shifting
definition of "AIDS." In the United States, the official definition has
been rewritten three times, and definitions vary widely around the
world. AIDS isn't simply the presence of the HIV virus; it's a
fictitious disease label that's attached to a list of symptoms that
continues to expand as the drug companies attempt to ensnare yet more
victims into the AIDS label trap.
The experts sound off
House of Numbers is not a "fringe" film featuring dissenting
opinions from conspiracy theorists. Rather, it is a lucid, intelligent
collection of conversations with some of the world's top virologists
and Nobel prize-winning scientists, including former experts from the
CDC, the WHO and UNAIDS. Many are speaking out against the conventional
AIDS mythology for the first time on camera.
Those interviewed for the film include Dr. Robert Gallo, Dr.
Luc Montagnier, Dr. Michael Gottlieb, Dr. Joe Sonnabend, Dr. Kary
Mullis, James Curran, Dr. Peter Piot, Dr. James Chin, Dr. Peter
Duesberg and many others.
The film has already received "Best Documentary" and other
awards from the many film festivals where it has been featured.
Momentum is building for the film, and mainstream distribution looks
like a healthy possibility for 2010.
"My main hope is that it educates people about the fact that
this isn't a clear cut issue," says Leung. "I also hope it empowers
people - that it causes them to question not just HIV and AIDS, but all
facets of issues which impact our lives. I think we should further
explore what we don't know, and to welcome further discussion, because
that will help us to know more and become more informed."
My take on the film
I've served as the editor of NaturalNews for six years, and in
that time, I've watched the pharmaceutical industry engage in rampant disease mongering
in order to push their high-profit pills. They've done it with
psychiatric disorders, high cholesterol and many other conditions. I've
also watched how the cancer industry is based entirely on lies about
some search for a "cure" even while most of the industry continues to
push mammograms that actually cause cancer.
The AIDS industry has a lot in common with the cancer industry, in
fact. They're both based on scientific quackery. They both demand the
dogmatic worship of a particular set of completely non-scientific
"truths" that cannot be challenged, and they both focus on generating
pharmaceutical profits at the expense of human health.
Also, both industries depend entirely upon the continuation of the disease
they claim to treat. Where would Big Pharma be without cancer, AIDS and
vaccines? Profits would fall sharply. So diagnosing as many people as
possible with AIDS (and cancer) is an important strategy for boosting
Big Pharma's annual revenues.
After reading books on AIDS by Dr. Gary Null and others, I'm convinced that the official mythology about AIDS is a cruel hoax
perpetrated by the drug companies. That doesn't mean there aren't
people suffering from very real immune suppression disorders, but I
believe it is far too simplistic to explain the root causes as being
solely due to HIV. The entire HIV explanation is just a clever way to
shift control over AIDS patients into the hands of drug companies where
highly toxic chemicals are sold at ridiculous profits to people who are
rarely helped by them.
The collection of immune suppression symptoms typically
labeled "AIDS" could be far more effectively treated with naturopathic
health strategies, including aggressive detoxification strategies, the
removal of heavy metals, the avoidance of environmental synthetic
chemicals (in foods, drugs, personal care products, homes and offices)
and the addition of powerful immune-boosting herbs, foods and
superfoods.
Essentially, AIDS can be cured in much the same way cancer can be cured: By radically altering food intake and lifestyle decisions to support a vibrant, healthy immune system.
Remember what Dr Luc Montagnier said in the film: "We can be
exposed to HIV many times without being ... infected. Our immune system
creates [antibodies] within a few weeks, if you have a good immune
system."
In other words, AIDS exposure is not a death sentence (as Big
Pharma would have you believe). It's like many other viruses: A
weakened, suppressed immune system gives it the opportunity to wreak
havoc throughout your body, but a strong immune system allows you to
overcome AIDS and build up your own immunity in a few weeks.
Essentially, being labeled "HIV-positive" is a tactic being
used around the world to scare people into buying more high-profit AIDS
drugs. But HIV-positive isn't a death sentence, either. With the right
immune-supporting solutions in place, even people who carry the HIV
virus can live out a full life without any symptoms of AIDS.
What's fantastic about House of Numbers is that it has the courage to challenge the status quo with much-needed critical thinking about HIV and AIDS. As such, House of Numbers
is a daring yet brilliant foray into the realms of contradictory
medicine where myth trumps science... and profits win out against human
compassion. For such a powerful film to have been created by such a
young filmmaker is remarkable in itself; and for any film to so
courageously challenge the broken mythology of the AIDS industry is an
accomplishment for which any filmmaker -- at any age -- should be
widely recognized.
House of Numbers will rock the AIDS establishment and cause a
whole new generation of thinkers to start critically questioning HIV /
AIDS mythology (and the for-profit corporations that push it).
The AIDS myth - what the experts say
To provide more information on this topic, we've pulled
together a collection of statements about HIV and AIDS from our library
of top health books. We're including a few quotes here, and you can
read the full collection (7 pages of quotes) here.
The renaming of old diseases as AIDS further supports the hypothesis
that the AIDS syndrome is never found in anyone without presence of
HIV. By definition, there is no AIDS without HIV, regardless how many
non-HIV people may die from the very same symptoms. Accordingly,
anything that even remotely resembles immune deficiency plus HIV now
counts as an AIDS disease, despite the fact that AIDS patients with
Kaposi's sarcoma have been reported to have normal immune systems. It
has been argued that wherever there is HIV, AIDS will be the
consequence. However, this argument is heavily flawed.
He sees AIDS as a sort of catch-all term that "spuriously
links 29 (at last count) old and extremely heterogeneous AIDS indicator
diseases together with a presumption of HIV infection." Those who
believe in AIDS as a new syndrome, he says, would have a case if,
indeed, it were "a serious disease of acquired immune deficiency
without preexisting or induced immune deficiency." The problem is that
"in all verifiable cases, demonstrable immune-suppressive disease
and/or treatment have always preceded" the onset of AIDS.
In fact, he showed that HIV alone could not cause AIDS.
Increasing evidence indicates that AIDS may be a toxicity syndrome or
metabolic disorder that is caused by immunity risk factors, including
heroin, sex-enhancement drugs, antibiotics, commonly prescribed AIDS
drugs, rectal intercourse, starvation, malnutrition, and dehydration.
Dozens of prominent scientists working at the forefront of AIDS
research now openly question the virus hypothesis of AIDS.
Another report also noted low serum zinc levels in those
with AIDS but not other stages of HIV (human immunodeficiency virus)
infection. A child with AIDS was found to have all the signs and
symptoms of a zinc-deficiency disorder. It is still unclear why these
AIDS patients have low serum zinc levels. What is clear is that this
aspect of the AIDS problem should be vigorously pursued. These exciting
findings justify further clinical trials to determine the effects of
supplementary zinc on the immune system and in the treatment of immune
disorders such as AIDS.
EFFEDIEFFESHOP.com
La libreria on-line di EFFEDIEFFE: una selezione di oltre 1300 testi, molti introvabili, in linea con lo spirito editoriale che ci contraddistingue.
Servizi online EFFEDIEFFE.com
Archivio EFFEDIEFFE :Cerca nell'archivio EFFEDIEFFE tutti i nostri articoli dal 2004 in poi.
Il sito www.effedieffe.com.non è un "prodotto editoriale diffuso al pubblico con periodicità regolare e contraddistinto da una testata", come richiede la legge numero 62 del 7 marzo 2001. Gli aggiornamenti vengono effettuati senza alcuna scadenza fissa e/o periodicità