Israel's hawkish government, led by Benjamin Netanyahu, is the most vocal of Iran's critics, labelling its nuclear ambitions an existential threat to the Jewish state and calling repeatedly for tougher economic sanctions by the international community. But what it demands of others, it apparently fails to do itself, Israeli commentators say.

"Netanyahu, who endlessly preaches the need for firm action against Iran to prevent it from acquiring nuclear arms, is not lifting a finger to stop Israeli companies and individuals indirectly trading with Iran," wrote Yossi Melman in the left-leaning newspaper Haaretz.

Ofer Bros was one of seven companies singled out by the United States for punishment last week after it sold a tanker to an Iranian front company in contravention of US sanctions. Days later, Israeli media revealed that it enjoyed even more extensive trading links with the Islamic Republic than previously understood.

The revelations embroil the Israeli government in an embarrassing and murky affair that has transfixed the domestic media and spawned vivid speculation about the nature of relations between Ofer Bros and Israel's shadowy security services.

Ofer, owned by octogenarian brothers Sammy and Yuli Ofer, is now facing an unprecedented storm of domestic criticism, fuelled by a long-standing animosity to a company that has often courted controversy in its business dealings. Among the most pressing of questions is just how much successive Israeli governments knew and to what extent its security services were complicit in the company's involvement with Iran. Several Israeli newspapers have quoted sources close to Ofer Bros as saying that the corporation was furthering Israel's security interests in Iran. Mr Netanyahu has said only that his government approved no deals with the Iranians.

The affair erupted last week when the US claimed the company had sold a tanker to the Islamic Republic of Iran Shipping Lines for $8.6m via its Singapore-based subsidiary Tanker Pacific. Ofer responded by saying it did not know the buyer was a front for the Iranian company. US officials said Ofer Bros did not do the due diligence that would have revealed the client's real identity.

The US move deals a heavy blow to Ofer Bros. It will not be able to draw loans of more than $10 billion from US banks, secure financing from the Export-Import Bank of the US or receive US export licences.

At home, the Ofer family came under even further scrutiny after a newspaper alleged that ships belonging to companies owned by the group had docked in Iranian ports to load and offload goods at least 13 times in the past decade. The allegations prompted discussion over whether the company broke Israeli law that prohibits trade with enemy states.

The affair took a bizarre and titillating turn this week, when a MP abruptly cancelled a televised parliamentary meeting to discuss the affair after being handed a hand-written note. Carmel Shama-Hacohen has refused to discuss what was in the note, saying that it did not come from a political or business figure, prompting speculation that it originated with the security services.

Further clouding the picture, Mr Shama-Hacohen added: "It turns out that reality is much more complex, much more complicated and touchy than the average imagination can handle."

His words only heightened speculation that Ofer Bros had helped Israel's security services, an assumption apparently encouraged by sources close to the Ofer family. The best-selling Yedioth Ahronoth quoted a high-ranking official as saying that the company had "performed a significant service for the state of Israel ... at times while endangering their business."

Ronen Bergman, the author of an forthcoming book on Mossad, the Israeli secret service, said that while Israel had a history of using Israeli or Jewish businessmen to further its security interests, Ofer Bros could be playing up its co-operation with the security services to limit the damage to its reputation domestically. "According to the bizarre psychology of Israelis, you can be blamed with all sorts of wrongdoing" and get away with it, he said, referring to allegations levelled at Ofer Bros in the past. "But if you damage national security or are blamed for doing business with the 'empire of evil'... they [Ofer Bros] know this will not go away easily."

Others, such as the Labour party MP Einat Wilf, were sceptical that there was any truth to the suggestions. "They are trying to create a smokescreen to defend enormous economic interests by using the pretext of security so the whole world will just say 'Amen' and ask no questions," Ms Wilf told public radio.

The Ofer siblings, estimated by Forbes magazine to have a combined wealth of $10.3 billion, control a vast array of holdings in Israel and overseas, spanning energy, shipping and media. But their businesses have frequently attracted unwelcome scrutiny, and critics have charged that the brothers grew rich at the expense of the state, buying up privatised assets cheaply with the collusion of government officials.

Among their most profitable enterprises is the controversial Dead Sea Works, a chemical plant that is blamed for extensive pollution and causing the sea to shrink at an alarming rate. The brothers were accused of influencing the Israeli media when domestic television channels refused to broadcast an documentaryinvestigating links between Ofer Bros and the political establishment. It was shown by Channel 1 after it agreed to air a filmed response from the company.

Prohibited practice

Lloyds TSB, Barclays and Credit Suisse The banks forfeited hundreds of millions of dollars to US authorities in 2009 and 2010 for unlawfully allowing financial transactions to take place between nations prohibited by US sanctions. Officials from Lloyds TSB, which was forced to pay out $350m, admitted that the British bank had removed data detailing the origins and destinations of transactions for Sudan and Iran, for fear that the US would block the deals when they were wired through the American banking system.

The Weir Group PLC The Glasgow-based engineering firm agreed to pay almost £14m last year after breaching UN sanctions covering its oil-for-food programme (set up in 1995 to allow Iraq to sell oil in exchange for food and medical supplies). Weir, which makes valves and pumps for the oil and gas industry, admitted it paid £3.1m to an agent which arranged contracts for Saddam Hussein's government between 2000 and 2002.

Royal Bank of Scotland The UK's Financial Services Authority fined RBS £5.6m last year for failing to ensure that enough checks were in place to prevent funds from being transferred to terrorist units or other groups prohibited under Treasury sanctions.

by Catrina Stewart in Jerusalem

Source >  Indipendent