A Conservative Estimate of Total Direct U.S. Aid to Israel: Almost $114 Billion
Washington Report On Middle East Affair
17 Aprile 2009
TABLE 1: Direct U.S. Aid to Israel (millions of
dollars)
|
Year
|
Total
|
|
Economic
Grant
|
Immigrant
|
ASHA
|
All Other
|
1949-1996 |
68,030.9
|
29,014.9
|
23,122.4
|
868.9
|
121.4
|
14,903.3
|
1997 |
3,132.1
|
1,800.0
|
1,200.0
|
80.0
|
2.1
|
50.0
|
1998 |
3,080.0
|
1,800.0
|
1,200.0
|
80.0
|
?
|
?
|
1999 |
3,010.0
|
1,860.0
|
1,080.0
|
70.0
|
?
|
?
|
2000 |
4,131.85
|
3,120.0
|
949.1
|
60.0
|
2.75
|
?
|
2001 |
2,876.05
|
1,975.6
|
838.2
|
60.0
|
2.25
|
?
|
2002 |
2,850.65
|
2,040.0
|
720.0
|
60.0
|
2.65
|
28.0
|
2003 |
3,745.15
|
3,086.4
|
596.1
|
59.6
|
3.05
|
?
|
2004 |
2,687.25
|
2,147.3
|
477.2
|
49.7
|
3.15
|
9.9
|
2005 |
2,612.15
|
2,202.2
|
357.0
|
50.0
|
2.95
|
?
|
2006 |
2,534.53
|
2,257.0
|
237.0
|
40.0
|
?
|
.53
|
2007 |
2,500.24
|
2,340.0
|
120.0
|
40.0
|
?
|
.24
|
2008 |
2,423.8
|
2,380.6
|
0.0
|
39.7
|
3.0
|
.5
|
Total |
103,614.67
|
56,024.0
|
30,897.0
|
1,557.9
|
143.3
|
14,992.47
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Notes: FY 2000 military grants include $1.2
billion for the Wye agreement and $1.92 billion in annual military aid. FY 2003
military aid included $1 billion from the supplemental appropriations bill. The
economic grant was earmarked for $960 million for FY 2000 but was reduced to
meet the 0.38% rescission. Final amounts for FY 2003 are reduced by 0.65%
mandated rescission, the amounts for FY 2004 are reduced by 0.59%, and the
amounts for FY 2008 are reduced by .81%.
|
|
Sources: CRS Report RL33222: U.S. Foreign Aid
to Israel, updated Jan. 2, 2008, plus the FY ’08 omnibus appropriations
bill, H.R. 2764. |
This estimate of total U.S. direct aid to Israel updates the estimate given
in the July 2006 issue of the Washington Report on Middle East Affairs.
It is an estimate because arriving at an exact figure is not possible, since
parts of U.S. aid to Israel are a) buried in the budgets of various U.S.
agencies, mostly that of the Defense Department (DOD), or b) in a form not
easily quantifiable, such as the early disbursement of aid, giving Israel a
direct benefit in interest income and the U.S. Treasury a corresponding loss.
Given these caveats, our current estimate of cumulative total direct aid to
Israel is $113.8554 billion.
It must be emphasized that this analysis is a conservative, defensible
accounting of U.S. direct aid to Israel, NOT of Israel’s cost to the U.S. or the
American taxpayer, nor of the benefits to Israel of U.S. aid. The distinction is
important, because the indirect or consequential costs suffered by the U.S. as a
result of its blind support for Israel exceed by many times the substantial
amount of direct aid to Israel. (See, for example, the late Thomas R. Stauffer’s
article in the June 2003 Washington Report, “The Costs to American
Taxpayers of the Israeli-Palestinian Conflict: $3 Trillion.”)
Especially, this computation does not include the costs resulting from the
invasion and occupation of Iraq—hundreds of billions of dollars, 4,000-plus U.S.
and allied fatalities, untold tens of thousands of Iraqi deaths, and many
thousands of other U.S., allied, and Iraqi casualties—which is almost
universally believed in the Arab world to have been undertaken for the benefit
of Israel. Among other “indirect or consequential” costs would be the costs of
U.S. unilateral economic sanctions on Iran, Iraq, Libya and Syria, the costs to
U.S. manufacturers of the Arab boycott, and the costs to U.S. companies and
consumers of the 1973 Arab oil embargo and consequent and subsequent soaring oil
prices partially as a result of U.S. support for Israel.
Among the real benefits to Israel that are not direct costs to the U.S.
taxpayer are the early cash transfer of economic and military aid, in-country
spending of a portion of military aid, and loan guarantees. The U.S. gives
Israel all of its economic and military aid directly in cash during the first
month of the fiscal year, with no accounting required of how the funds are used.
Also, in contrast with other countries receiving military aid, who must purchase
through the DOD, Israel deals directly with the U.S. companies, with no DOD
review. Furthermore, Israel is allowed to spend 26.3 percent of each year’s
military aid in Israel (no other recipient of U.S. military aid gets this
benefit), which has resulted in an increasingly sophisticated Israeli defense
industry. As a result, Israel has become a major world arms exporter; the
Congressional Research Service (CRS) reports that in 2006 Israel was the world’s
ninth leading supplier of arms worldwide, earning $4.4 billion from defense
sales.
Another benefit to Israel are U.S. government loan guarantees. The major loan
guarantees have been $600 million for housing between 1972 and 1990; $9.2
billion for Soviet Jewish resettlement between 1992 and 1997; about $5 billion
for refinancing military loans commercially; and $9 billion in loan guarantees
authorized in FY ’03 and extended to FY ’10. Of that $9 billion, CRS reports
that Israel has drawn $4.1 billion through FY ’07. These loans have not—yet—cost
the U.S. any money; they are listed on the Treasury Department’s books as
“contingent liabilities,” which would be liabilities to the U.S. should Israel
default. However, they have been of substantial, tangible benefit to Israel,
because they enable Israel to borrow commercially at special terms and favorable
interest rates.
Components of Israel Aid
Israel is the largest cumulative recipient of U.S. aid since World War II
(not counting the huge sums being spent in Iraq). The $3 billion or so per year
that Israel receives from the U.S. amounts to about $500 per Israeli. Most of
this money is earmarked in the annual Foreign Operations (foreign aid)
appropriations bills, with the three major items being military grants (Foreign
Military Financing, or FMF), economic grants (Economic Support Funds, or ESF),
and “migration and refugee assistance.” (Refugee assistance originally was
intended to help Israel absorb Jewish refugees from the Soviet Union, but this
was expanded in 1985 to include all refugees resettling in Israel. In fact,
Israel doesn’t differentiate between refugees and other immigrants, so this
money is used for all immigrants to Israel.)
Not earmarked but also included in congresssional appropriations bills is
Israel’s portion of grants for American Schools and Hospitals Abroad (ASHA) and
monies buried in the appropriations for other departments or agencies. These are
mostly for so-called “U.S.-Israeli cooperative programs” in defense,
agriculture, science, and hi-tech industries.
Before 1998, Israel received annually $1.8 billion in military grants and
$1.2 billion in economic grants. Then, beginning in FY ‘99, the two countries
agreed to reduce economic grants to Israel by $120 million and increase military
grants by $60 million annually over 10 years. FY ’08 is the last year of that
agreement, with military grants reaching $2.4 billion (reduced by an
across-the-board rescission), and zero economic grants. Then, in August 2007,
U.S. and Israeli officials signed a memorandum of understanding for a new
10-year, $30 billion aid package whereby FMF will gradually increase, beginning
with $2.55 billion in FY ’09, and average $3 billion per year over the 10-year
period.
Methodology
TABLE 2: Foreign Aid and DOD Appropriations
Legislation Since FY
2004
|
|
Basic Documents |
Conference Report |
Public Law |
FY '04 Defense |
H.R. 2658 |
H.Rept. 108-283 |
P.L. 108-87 |
Omnibus |
H.R. 2673 |
H.Rept. 108-401 |
P.L. 108-199 |
FY '05 Defense |
H.R. 4613 |
H.Rept. 108-662 |
P.L. 108-287 |
Omnibus |
H.R. 4818 |
H.Rept. 108-792 |
P.L. 108-447 |
FY '06 Defense |
H.R. 2863 |
H.Rept. 109-359 |
P.L. 109-148 |
Foreign Aid |
H.R. 3057 |
H.Rept. 109-265 |
P.L. 109-102 |
FY '07 Defense |
H.R. 5631 |
H.Rept. 109-676 |
P.L. 109-289 |
Foreign Aid |
H.J.Res. 20 |
|
P.L. 110-5 |
FY '08 Defense |
H.R. 3222 |
H.Rept. 110-434 |
P.L. 110-116 |
Omnibus |
H.R. 2764 |
H.Rept. 110-497 |
P.L. 110-161 |
|
|
|
|
Notes: H.R.=House Resolution; S.=Senate
Resolution; H.Rept.=House Report; the “public law” is the final, binding
version, as signed by the president. In FY ’04, ’05, and ’08 defense was passed
separately and foreign aid was included in the consolidated or “omnibus” bill.
In FY ’07 defense was passed separately and foreign aid was included in the
continuing resolution, H.J. Res. 20, which continued ’07 appropriations at the
’06 level with some exceptions—including, of course, for
Israel. |
As with previous Washington Report estimates of U.S. aid to Israel,
this analysis is based on the annual CRS report, U.S. Foreign Aid to
Israel, which uses available and verifiable numbers, primarily from the
foreign operations appropriations bills. Although the CRS report does include
such things as the old food for peace program, the $1.2 billion from the Wye
agreement, the $1 billion in FMF included in the FY ’03 Emergency Supplemental
appropriations bill, the subsidy for “refugee resettlement,” and money from the
ASHA account, it does not include money from the DOD and other agencies. Nor
does it include estimated interest on the early disbursement of aid.
The January 2008 CRS report on aid to Israel shows a total of $101.1908
billion through FY ’07. Table 1, on the previous page, is drawn from the summary
table of that report, plus $2.4238 billion from the FY ’08 omnibus
appropriations bill and estimates for ASHA and “other” amounts in FY ’08, for a
total of $103.6147 billion through FY ’08.
To that has been added $10.2407 billion, as detailed below, for a grand total
of $113.8554 billion.
Estimated Amounts Not Included in Table 1: $10.2407 Billion
Defense Department Funds: $7.694 Billion. For previous
estimates, a search going back several years was able to identify $6.794 billion
from the DOD to Israel through FY ‘06. Adding $450 million from the FY ’07 DOD
appropriations and $450 million from the ’08 appropriations gives a total of
$7.694 billion. (The FY ’08 appropriations bill earmarks $155.6 million for
Israel. However, AIPAC’s Web site reported that the total for earmarked and
non-earmarked programs was $450 million—and who would know better than the
Israel lobby itself?)
The military aid from the DOD budget is mostly for specific projects. The
largest items have been the canceled Lavi attack fighter project, the completed
Merkava tank, the ongoing Arrow anti-missile missile project, and several other
anti-missile systems, most recently the “David’s Sling” short-range missile
defense system. Haaretz reported in June that a senior U.S. defense
official has said the U.S. will support and help Israel’s development of the
advanced Arrow 3 designed to intercept advanced ballistic missiles. The fact
that the U.S. military was not interested in the Lavi or the Merkava for its own
use and has said the same thing about the Arrow and the other anti-missile
projects would seem to jettison the argument that these are “joint defense
projects.” The FY ‘01 appropriations bill also gave Israel a grant of $700
million worth of military equipment, to be drawn down from stocks in Western
Europe, and the FY ’05 defense appropriations bill includes a provision
authorizing the DOD to transfer an unspecified amount of “surplus” military
items from inventory to Israel. In addition, since 1988 Israel has been
designated a “major non-NATO ally,” giving it access to U.S. weapons systems at
lower prices, and preferential treatment in bidding for U.S. defense
contracts.
Interest: $2.089 Billion. Israel receives its U.S. economic
and military aid in a lump sum within one month of the new fiscal year or the
passage of the appropriations act. Applying one-half of the prevailing interest
rate to the aid for each year (on the assumption that the aid monies are drawn
down over the course of the year), the July 2006 estimate arrived at a total of
$1.991 billion through FY ’06. To that, using an interest rate of 4 percent, is
added $50 million for FY ’07 and $48 million for FY ’08, for a cumulative total
of $2.089 billion through FY ’08.
Other Grants and Endowments: $457.7 Million. The July 2006
report included $456.7 million in U.S. grants and endowments to U.S.-Israeli
scientific and business cooperation organizations. The two largest are the BIRD
(Israel-U.S. Binational Research & Development) Foundation and the BARD
(Binational Agriculture and Research and Development) Fund. While these are
mostly self-sustaining, the BARD Fund gets about $500,000 a year from the
Agriculture Department. Adding $0.5 million for each of FY ’07 and ‘08 to the
’06 total gives a new total of $0.457.7 billion.
For the convenience of those who wish to look up more details, citations for
the foreign aid and DOD appropriations bills for the past five years are given
in Table 2 above.
by Shirl McArthur, a retired U.S. foreign service officer, is a consultant
based in the Washington, DC area.
Source > WRMEA.com